E-Filing and E-Service
Why it Matters
The last screen of the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal warns that clicking Submit is final. By then the document must already be in the form the rules require, and its public copy must show no more of anyone’s account numbers or children’s names than the rules allow. The same click serves the document on every recipient the filer selected and fixes its filing time. Florida’s rules treat anything submitted with a lawyer’s login as the lawyer’s own act, and they let a paralegal use that login at the lawyer’s direction. You will prepare one motion for that click, walk the Portal’s screens up to it, and read a federal case’s record through a free archive of documents other people bought from PACER.
Current Context
In June 2026, the federal judiciary announced its first PACER fee increase in nearly fifteen years (opens in a new tab), from 10 to 12 cents a page for five years starting January 1, 2027. A user will owe nothing for a quarter that stays at $40 or less, up from $30. The money pays for replacing CM/ECF, the federal courts’ filing system, on a schedule sped up after what the judiciary called sophisticated and persistent attacks on the system in 2025 (opens in a new tab). On September 17, 2026, the head of the judiciary’s Administrative Office told the Judicial Conference (opens in a new tab) that the first part of the new system would be released before the end of 2026. Anyone who reads federal records past the new allowance will pay a fifth more per page while the system that receives those records is rebuilt.
Key Concepts
The E-Filing Portal
Florida’s central system for filing in its courts, which lawyers must use under Rules 2.511 and 2.525. Anything submitted with a registered user’s login is that user’s own act and signature, even when a paralegal clicks Submit at the lawyer’s direction. The Portal’s stamp sets the filing time, and on a last day, unless a rule or order sets another time, the stamp must come by 11:59:59 p.m., eastern time.
Document Format
Rule 2.520(a) requires a document created for filing to have letter-size pages, consecutive page numbers, 1-inch margins, and type of at least 12 points. The Florida Courts Technology Standards add that a filed PDF must be searchable and that the preferred PDF/A file must not carry comments, annotations, or hidden deleted text. An exhibit the firm did not create, such as the other side’s discovery response, is appended to the document that relies on it.
Signature Block and Certificates
Rule 2.515(c) requires a signature block with each signer’s name, electronic signature indicator, mailing address, telephone number, and e-mail address for service, plus a lawyer’s Bar number and client. A non-dispositive motion adds a certificate of conferral above the signature block under Rule 1.202. A certificate of service gives the date, the people served, their service addresses, and the method, as Rule 2.516(f) sets out.
Minimization of Sensitive Information
Rule 2.425 limits a court filing to a known minor’s initials, the year of a birth date, and no part of a Social Security, bank, credit card, charge, or debit account number. Numbers such as a driver’s license, telephone, insurance policy, or customer account number may show only their last four digits, unless an exception in subdivision (b) applies. A black box drawn over a number does not meet the rule, because the digits stay in the file for anyone to copy.
Notice of Confidential Information
Rule 2.420(d)(1)(B) lists information the clerk must keep confidential, such as Social Security and bank account numbers, adoption records, and records of a minor’s settlement. A filer whose document contains any of it must file a Notice of Confidential Information within Court Filing at the same time, saying where it is. Filing a document also represents that its confidential and sensitive information has been protected under Rules 2.420 and 2.425.
Portal Service
Rule 2.516(b)(1) requires a document filed through the Portal to be served through its e-service, and service on each recipient on the service list is complete on filing. The filer selects the recipients from the case’s list and must immediately serve, by another permitted means, anyone the filer learns did not receive the document. A filed document is not served on the judge unless a statute, rule, administrative order, or court order requires it.
Correction Queue
Rule 2.525(f)(1) lets the clerk hold back only a document with a listed defect, such as a missing or wrong case style or several documents filed as one. It waits in a correction queue for 30 days after the filer is notified, and a corrected, substantially identical filing in that time relates back to the first attempt. The clerk dockets every other document and may note a rule violation, and the court may then strike it.
PACER and the RECAP Archive
PACER is the paid public window into CM/ECF, the federal courts’ filing system, and it charges by the page, with most documents and docket sheets capped at the price of 30 pages. Opinions are free, no fee is owed for a quarter at or below a set amount, and each party’s lawyer gets one free copy of each filing through the notice of electronic filing. The RECAP Archive holds free copies of whatever users of the RECAP browser extension bought, so it has only what someone paid for, and its copy of a docket can be out of date.
Resources
- Draft motion (Kim Nguyen’s motion to compel as Marcy Cole left it on the shared drive, in Word.)
- Exhibits A through C (The motion’s three exhibits in one PDF, as Marcy assembled them.)
- Filing workbook (The Matter Record, the Minimization Log, the Service List, the Docket Reading, and the firm’s Filing Checklist. Its Start Here sheet says what goes where.)
- Florida Rules of Court Procedure, The Florida Bar (opens in a new tab) (The current rules. Rules 2.420, 2.425, 2.511, 2.514, 2.515, 2.516, 2.520, and 2.525 are in the Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, and Rules 1.202, 1.350, and 1.380 are in the Rules of Civil Procedure.)
- Portal E-Filer User Manual, September 2025, Florida Courts E-Filing Authority (opens in a new tab) (Every screen of the filing path, with pictures. “File Document(s) on Existing Case to Clerk” starts on page 48, and the My Submissions page, which shows a filing’s status after Submit, is on page 34.)
- Florida Courts Technology Standards (opens in a new tab) (The standards Rule 2.520(b) points to. Section 2.1 covers file formats, searchable PDFs, the 50 MB limit on a filing, and what a PDF/A filing may not contain.)
- Help Desk, Florida Courts E-Filing Authority (opens in a new tab) (The Portal’s support line and online request form, the place to report a Portal that will not take a filing.)
- Save or convert to PDF or XPS, Microsoft Support (opens in a new tab) (How Word saves a PDF/A file, and where its options decide whether markup and document properties go into the PDF.)
- Redact PDF, PDF24 Tools (opens in a new tab) (Free, with no account. It turns each redacted page into an image so the covered text is gone, and the site’s OCR and Merge PDF tools make the pages searchable again and join the motion to its exhibits.)
- PDF24 Creator (opens in a new tab) (The same tools as a free Windows program that works without uploading anything, which is how a firm would handle a real client’s file.)
- Brown & Brown Ins. Servs., Inc. v. Legacy Ins. Grp., LLC, No. 6:25-cv-00624 (M.D. Fla. filed Apr. 8, 2025) (docket, CourtListener) (opens in a new tab) (The federal case you read in Part 6, removed from the circuit court for Volusia County. Only some of its documents are free.)
- PACER Pricing: How Fees Work (opens in a new tab) (The fee per page, the cap on a single document, the quarterly amount below which nothing is owed, and what is always free.)
- RECAP Suite, Free Law Project (opens in a new tab) (How the RECAP browser extension adds PACER purchases to the free archive, which is why the archive holds only what someone has bought.)
- Banks v. Banks, No. 4D2025-3026 (Fla. 4th DCA Feb. 4, 2026) (opens in a new tab) (A motion to disqualify a judge, served on the judge through the Portal and by e-mail. The judge ruled 45 days later, calling it “never served,” and the Fourth District held the motion deemed granted.)
- Madill v. Rivercrest Cmty. Ass’n, 273 So. 3d 1157 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (opens in a new tab) (A final judgment e-mailed by the judge’s assistant to a lawyer of record who never opened it. The firm’s system watched the court’s e-filing notices, and the Second District held that its late motion for fees was excusable neglect.)
What to Do
Kim Nguyen wants her motion on file Monday, and the draft on the shared drive would not get past the clerk. You bring the motion and its exhibits into the form the rules require and take out what the rules keep off a public record. You choose whom the Portal serves and walk its screens up to Submit. Then you read a real federal case through the RECAP Archive and price what PACER would have charged for it. What you post is the filing, ready for the Portal, and the workbook behind it, which ends with the firm’s filing checklist.
Part 1: Open the File
Temko & Eden, P.A. A three-lawyer firm on Beach Street in Daytona Beach. It still carries the names of its late founders. Dana Whitfield, the managing partner, handles civil litigation and real estate closings. Luis Ortega, a partner, handles family law and probate, and Kim Nguyen, an associate, handles personal injury. Marcy Cole is the legal assistant, Ron Pike is the bookkeeper and office manager, and you are the firm’s paralegal.
An email from Kim Nguyen, Friday, September 25, 2026. Kestrel still hasn’t produced the store’s video in Maria Zubieta’s case. Her deposition was nine days ago, so the reason Claire Whitcombe gave in July is gone, and when I called her this morning she said they won’t produce it without a court order. My motion to compel is on the shared drive, and Marcy put the three exhibits in one PDF. File it through the Portal under my account on Monday. Before you submit anything with my login, go through all of it: the format, the certificates, what the exhibits say about Maria and the store’s people, and who gets served. Marcy blacked out a couple of numbers, but check her work. Then tell me what you changed.
Download the draft motion, the exhibits, and the workbook, and read the workbook’s Start Here and Matter Record sheets. Then open the Florida Bar’s rules page from Resources. In the Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, read Rules 2.420(d), 2.425, 2.511, 2.515, 2.516, 2.520, and 2.525(e) and (f), and in the Rules of Civil Procedure, read Rule 1.202. Each one decides something you change in this activity.
Part 2: Take Out What the Record Cannot Hold
Read the motion and every page of the exhibits against Rule 2.425(a) and (b). A filing is a public record, so the question for each item is what the rule lets the court’s copy show, not whether the item feels private. Log each piece of designated sensitive information on the Minimization Log, one row for each place it appears, with the subdivision that governs it and what the filed copy will show. Before you trust a black box you did not draw, test it: search the PDF for the digits under it, or select the page’s text and paste it into a plain-text editor.
Fix the motion’s text in Word. For the exhibits, use a tool that removes what it covers, such as PDF24’s Redact PDF. Then run its OCR tool on the result so the pages can be searched again, and repeat your search and copy test on the new file. Every name and number in these files is fictional, so an online tool is fine here; with a real client’s file, use a program that runs on your own computer. Run the Minimization Auditor with your log and the rule’s text, and settle each point where it disagrees with you by reading the rule again. Then answer the three questions at the bottom of the sheet.
Part 3: Put the Motion in Filing Form
Check the motion against Rule 2.520(a) and Rule 2.515(c). Compare its caption with the case style on the Matter Record, since a wrong style is one of the few defects that send a filing to the correction queue. Add the certificate of conferral Rule 1.202 requires, drawn from Kim’s email, above the signature block. Before you save a PDF, find out what else the Word file carries: its Review tab and the save dialog’s options (Resources) show what would travel with it. Save the motion as a PDF/A, and join it to the redacted exhibits in one PDF, motion first, so the exhibits are appended to the document that relies on them. Then run the Clerk’s Review with a description of the finished file, and check each problem it raises against the rule it cites before you change anything.
Part 4: Choose Whom the Portal Serves
The Service List sheet shows the case’s service list as the Portal would present it when you file, and the Portal serves no one you have not selected. Decide for each row whether to serve, and give the rule or the manual page that decides it. Rule 2.516(a) and (c) and the manual’s Service List section answer every row. Then write the certificate of service in the form Rule 2.516(f) sets out, and put it in the motion above the signature block. Answer section C, what the firm must do if the Notice of Electronic Filing shows the motion never reached Claire Whitcombe. The Service Scenarios prompt gives you more cases like it to practice on.
Part 5: Walk the Portal and Write the Checklist
You will not file anything, and you do not need a Portal account. Open the E-Filer User Manual at “File Document(s) on Existing Case to Clerk” and walk its screens in order, from the E-Filing Map to Review and Submit. For each screen, fill in a row of section B of the Filing Checklist: what you would enter or choose for Kim’s motion, what you would check before going on, and the manual page. Watch for what the manual says about Volusia County on the Case Parties screen, about confidential information on the Documents screen, and about Submit itself.
Then write sections A, C, and D. Section A holds the checks on the document before anyone logs in, and section C what to confirm on the My Submissions page after Submit. Section D covers a filing’s last day, a Portal that is down, a filing in the correction queue, and service that fails. Rules 2.514(a), 2.516(b), and 2.525(e) and (f) answer most of it. Where no rule answers a situation, say so, and say what the firm does instead.
Part 6: Read a Federal Docket for Free
Federal courts take filings through CM/ECF, and the public reads them through PACER, a page at a time, for a fee. Open Brown & Brown Insurance Services, Inc. v. Legacy Insurance Group, LLC in the RECAP Archive from Resources. The case began in the circuit court for Volusia County and reached the federal court in Orlando by removal, so its first entry carries the state court’s record with it. Fill in the Docket Reading sheet with the case’s details and the two courts’ stamps on page 2 of the state court complaint. Then work out what PACER would charge for Document 1 at today’s fee, and what the free archive leaves out. Paste the docket’s entries into the Docket Translator, and check each row of its table against the docket page.
Part 7: Post Your Deliverables
Create one new discussion thread. Attach the filing as one PDF, the motion followed by Exhibits A through C, and the workbook with every sheet filled in. Add three to four sentences on the item in the packet you would most have regretted missing, and the rule that caught it.
Part 8: Share Chat Link
Include one AI chat link with a 1–2 sentence explanation of what the conversation shows and why you chose to share it.
Suggested AI Prompts
Use these prompts as a starting point, then adjust them to fit your goal. Strong prompting develops through trial, revision, and testing. It’s a foundational skill that grows into more advanced AI work such as context engineering and agent-based workflows.
Minimization Auditor
I am a paralegal preparing a motion and its exhibits for filing in a Florida circuit court. I will paste the text of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.425(a) and (b), then my log of every piece of sensitive information I found and what the filed copy will show. The names and numbers are fictional. Using only the rule text I paste, check each row: does the subdivision I cited govern that kind of information, and does what the filed copy shows stay within its limit? Then list any kind of information the rule covers that my log never mentions, so I can search the documents for it again. Quote the words of the rule behind each point. If the rule’s text does not settle a row, say so instead of guessing. Do not rewrite my log. Wait for me to paste both.
Source grounding ties every answer to words you can check, and the model never sees the documents, so each gap it names is a reason to look again rather than a finding. With a real client’s file, describe the items the way your log does and never paste the numbers into a public chatbot.
Clerk’s Review
Act as a deputy clerk in a Florida circuit court who reviews documents filed through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal. I will paste the text of Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.520 and 2.525(f), and then describe a motion I am about to file: its caption, case number, page size, margins, type size, page numbering, signature block, certificates, how its exhibits are attached, and whether the PDF is searchable. Ask me about one feature at a time. After each answer, tell me whether that feature could send the filing to the correction queue under Rule 2.525(f)(1), or whether the clerk would docket it anyway and leave the problem to the court. Cite the subdivision for each answer, and use only the text I paste.
Role assignment and one-question-at-a-time elicitation make you describe the file the way a reviewer sees it, which brings up details you stopped noticing. The split the prompt asks for matters, because the rule sends only a short list of defects to the queue and leaves the rest to the judge.
Service Scenarios
You are helping me practice Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516, and I will paste its text first. Then write six short scenarios about serving documents in a Florida civil case, each ending in a question, like this example: “A paralegal files a motion through the Portal but selects no one on the service list. Has anyone been served?” Mix documents filed through the Portal with documents that are served but not filed, and include service on a judge and a recipient who never received a filed document. Give me one scenario at a time and wait for my answer. After each answer, tell me whether I was right, quote the subdivision that decides it, and say whether the rule’s text leaves the answer open.
The example shows the model the size and shape of a good scenario, which is few-shot prompting, and answering before you see the rule makes you recall it instead of recognizing it. Check any answer that surprises you against the rule’s text, since Rule 2.516 was rewritten in 2025 and a model may quiz you on the old version.
Docket Translator
I am reading a federal district court docket in the RECAP Archive for a class, and I will paste its entries. Make a table with one row for each entry: the entry number, the date, who filed it or whether the court entered it, what kind of document it is in plain words, and whether the docket text alone tells me what the document says. Then list the entry numbers missing from the sequence, and the entries whose meaning I cannot tell without reading the document itself. Do not guess what an unread document says, and do not add facts that are not in the text I paste.
Structured output makes the model account for every entry, including the ones it cannot explain, and the instruction against guessing keeps a short docket description from turning into an invented summary. Check each row against the docket page itself, because a table can drop or merge entries without saying so.